What Happens if Investors Remove China from Emerging Markets and Global Indexes
- Portfolio Construction
- Equity Insights
- Index Equity
- Market & Investment Trends
China’s weight among emerging markets equities has risen significantly since the Global Financial Crisis in 2008, peaking at about 40%. As a result, investors are looking for ways to manage risk of this outsized weight, or even , without significantly affecting performance. We analyze China’s impact on emerging markets and global indexes, and we propose how investors may seek to control China’s influence in their emerging markets equity allocation.
A Growing Influence
As shown in Exhibit 1, China’s weight was well under 10% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index as recently as 2007. Afterwards, the nation’s clout and weighting in the index began to rise as its economy strengthened and its stock market rapidly added new listings. The weighting increase in the index continued until 2019, reaching a peak of about 40% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It has declined somewhat since then, sitting at 27% as of June 30, 2023.
Even at a quarter of total market capitalization for emerging markets, China remains a relatively small piece of the global market, at 3% of the global MSCI ACWI IMI Index. To put that in perspective, Apple represented about 4% of ACWI IMI as of June 30. In other words, removing China from the global portfolio is somewhat akin to choosing not to hold the Silicon Valley tech giant. This may not seem significant, but for passive investors, this does introduce meaningful relative to the global opportunity set.
Tracking error is the difference in performance between a portfolio and its benchmark, often used to determine the degree of active management of an investment strategy.
EXHIBIT 1: China's weight still relatively small in a global context
China has risen to represent 27% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, but it is only 3% of the MSCI ACWI IMI Index.
Index Performance With and Without China
With these index weightings in mind, we compared the performance of the emerging markets and global equity indexes “with China” and . We looked at since inception of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and the more recent five-year period. We think the five-year period better represents China’s current impact on equity markets and the impact that investors may expect in the future.
As shown in Exhibit 2, here’s what we found:
- The MSCI Emerging Markets Index returned 1.3% annually the past five years with volatility, as measured by standard deviation, of 18.9%. Removing China would have led to a 3.4% higher annualized return with just a 1.2% higher risk.
- At the global level, the differences are less pronounced. The MSCI ACWI IMI Index returned 8.6% annually over the past five years with a risk level of 17.9%. Removing China increased the return by 0.6% and risk by 0.3%.
- Notably, the indexes without China outperformed, because of China’s underperformance during the period as the country’s economy struggles to recover from the pandemic.
EXHIBIT 2: WIthout China, index risk-return profiles change
While return and risk changed significantly with China in the emerging markets index, the impact was less notable in the broader global index.
Based on this simple analysis, removing China from the emerging markets index impacted results but made little difference on the global index. For a more sophisticated view, we examined China’s exclusion from a few other angles: tracking error, periods of stress, geographic profile and sector profile.
China’s Impact on Tracking Error
The question of tracking error can be front-of-mind for investors when it comes to managing risk from China equities. They may want to understand how much the index’s performance without China differs from the benchmark index that includes China. We can demonstrate this through historical tracking error, or the percentage that the ex-China index differs from the benchmark index over a given time period. Exhibit 3 shows the tracking error of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Index against the broader MSCI Emerging Markets Index, again since 1999 and over the last five years.
The five-year data suggests that in any given year, an ex-China emerging markets investment is “likely” to outperform or underperform the MSCI Emerging Markets Index by as much as 8.2%. That is a significant number and comparable to a concentrated active equity manager. However, at the global equity portfolio level, removing China becomes much less noticeable, having produced a historical tracking error of 1.0%. This number, although smaller, is still significant for tracking error conscious investors whose investment policies may stipulate MSCI ACWI IMI as the performance benchmark.
EXHIBIT 3: Lower global influence on tracking error
While removing China from the MSCI Emerging Markets Index produced significant tracking error given its high weight, the impact on the Global ACWI IMI Index is much smaller since inception and over the last five years.
Stress Testing: Mixed Results
Often times, investors want to understand the impact of their decisions during times of market stress, because these are times when even seemingly minor decisions can have an outsized effect.
The top charts of Exhibit 4 highlight the performance of Chinese equities and emerging markets equities, both with and without China, during arguably the two most prolific stress periods of the recent past — the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. China modestly protected to the downside during the onset of the pandemic in the first quarter of 2020 but slightly exacerbated the during the Global Financial Crisis.
In the bottom chart of drawdowns since 1999, we find that China tended to be more susceptible to drawdowns than the full index. However, we expect that for a single country versus a more diversified group of countries found in the index. Notably, the differences in drawdown between emerging markets equities and emerging markets ex-China are fairly immaterial.
A percentage peak-to-trough reduction in the value of an investment.
EXHIBIT 4: China shows mixed results during recent market shocks
China limited some downside at the onset of the pandemic in 2020, but it fared worse during the Global Financial Crisis from 2007 to 2009. During drawdowns since 1999 (bottom chart), the emerging markets indexes with and without China have performed similarly.
Regional Analysis: Asia-Pacific Remains Influential without China
Now let’s look at China’s effect on index composition through regional and country weights. We appreciate that removing Chinese companies doesn’t remove all Chinese revenues or input costs, thanks to non-Chinese multi-nationals throughout Asia.
The MSCI Emerging Markets Index contains an eye-catching 78% allocation to the Asia-Pacific region, as shown in Exhibit 5. Even when removing China and its 27% weight, Asia-Pacific still represents 70% of the remaining index due to the significant weights of other markets in the region including 22% for Taiwan, 22% for India and 17% for Korea. So even though investors can remove or manage direct exposure to China, Asia-Pacific’s presence remains strong with influence from the other key countries in the region around China.
EXHIBIT 5: Without CHina, Asia-Pacific still weighs heavily
Without China, Asia-Pacific countries still would represent 70% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
Sector Analysis: A Cyclical Tilt in China
In Exhibit 6, we turn to the sector-level effects of removing China from the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, grouping sectors into three categories:
- Cyclicals: sectors most sensitive to changes in macroeconomic activity
- Secular Growers: growth-oriented sectors riding longer term demand trends
- Defensives: sectors showing stability during economic weakness
Emerging markets ex-China have more exposure to cyclicals such as financials, energy and materials and less though mixed exposure to , with an overweight to technology companies offset by underweights to communication services and consumer discretionary companies. It has slightly less exposure to including real estate and health care underweights. While we aren’t analyzing the outlooks for these sectors here, we think investors should be mindful of how the change in sector makeup may impact portfolio risk and return.
Secular investment trends are long-term economic, political or other forces that investors expect to impact the broad markets, sectors, industries or individual companies. This is opposed to cyclical trends, which are short-term and tend to follow economic cycles.
Defensive investments are in companies or industries with revenues and earnings that tend to be insensitive to swings in the economy, such as the consumer staples and utilities sectors.
EXHIBIT 6: Without CHina, exposure to cyclicals increases
Removing China makes the index more sensitive to cyclical sectors (financials, materials and energy) and less sensitive to secular growers, where decreases to the consumer discretionary (-6.5%) and communication services (-4.2%) sectors offset an increase to the information technology (+6.3) sector.
China Exposure: All or Nothing?
With the possibility that China’s significant weight in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index may grow meaningfully larger in the years to come, investors may want to maintain passive exposure but not necessarily at the weights dictated by the broader benchmark. To help control risk, one option for investors is to take a building block approach and create custom weights that suit their needs by investing in MSCI China and MSCI ex-China separately.
Exhibit 7 shows how an investor may choose to dial up or down exposure to China while still using passive indexes. The chart shows the expected active risk, versus the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, of portfolios comprised of varying allocations to the MSCI China Index and MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Index. Active risk falls to zero at the portfolio comprising a 27% weight for the China index and 73% weight for the emerging markets ex-China index because that portfolio represents the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, which had a weighting of 27% to China as of June 30, 2023.
Fully excluding China results in an expected active risk of 6.48%, which may not be palatable for benchmark-aware investors. A more modest approach of adjusting the weight of China to, say, 20%, would result in an expected active risk of 2.09%, which may be more acceptable. As a practical matter, investors that take this type of approach to custom weighting China may want to consider aligning the decision with their target benchmark. In other words, choosing to avoid investing in China but leaving one’s target benchmark as MSCI Emerging Markets may create misalignment in the risk budgeting process.
EXHIBIT 7: Customizing Exposure to China through passive Indexes
Removing than removing China, investors can dial down their risk versus the benchmark index through varying portfolios of the MSCI China Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Index. Similar to tracking error, active risk for each portfolio represents the amount of risk investors that versus the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, with a higher percentage indicating more risk of underperforming the index.
Key Considerations for China in the Portfolio
Based on our analysis, removing Chinese equities from a global index has enough of an impact to results that a thorough understanding is required. The tracking error of removing China from the portfolio is significant for emerging markets investors. And although the impact is less prevalent in a global context, for passive investors it is still not something that can be overlooked.
While some investors may want to remove China altogether, another approach investors can take is to adjust their exposure to China through combinations of passive indexes.
Ultimately, this is an implementation decision for each investor to make on their own, and the decision depends on risk tolerance and views on the outlook for China. But we think investors, particularly passive index investors, do not necessarily need to accept China’s weight in the index as a given, and there are options available for investors that wish to make adjustments.
How China Impacts Your Portfolio
Removing Chinese equities from a global index impacts results enough to require a consideration by investors. For emerging markets investors, removing China creates potentially significant changes in returns, tracking error and risk. However, we don't think investors need to take an all-or-nothing approach, as they can adjust their exposure to China while still aligning with their portfolio objectives.
Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help?
For Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. The information contained herein is intended for use with current or prospective clients of Northern Trust Investments, Inc (NTI) or its affiliates. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. NTI or its affiliates may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.
This report is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.
All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTI or its affiliates’ efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTI or its affiliates. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For additional information on fees, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative.
Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTI or its affiliates’ current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve. Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information.
Hypothetical portfolio information provided does not represent results of an actual investment portfolio but reflects representative historical performance of the strategies, funds or accounts listed herein, which were selected with the benefit of hindsight. Hypothetical performance results do not reflect actual trading. No representation is being made that any portfolio will achieve a performance record similar to that shown. A hypothetical investment does not necessarily take into account the fees, risks, economic or market factors/conditions an investor might experience in actual trading. Hypothetical results may have under- or over-compensation for the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as lack of liquidity, economic or market factors/conditions. The investment returns of other clients may differ materially from the portfolio portrayed. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific program that cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results. The information is confidential and may not be duplicated in any form or disseminated without the prior consent of NTI or its affiliates.
This information is intended for purposes of NTI and/or its affiliates marketing as providers of the products and services described herein and not to provide any fiduciary investment advice within the meaning of Section 3(21) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). NTI and/or its affiliates are not undertaking to provide impartial investment advice or give advice in a fiduciary capacity to the recipient of these materials, which are for marketing purposes and are not intended to serve as a primary basis for investment decisions. NTI and its affiliates receive fees and other compensation in connection with the products and services described herein as well as for custody, fund administration, transfer agent, investment operations outsourcing, and other services rendered to various proprietary and third-party investment products and firms that may be the subject of or become associated with the services described herein.
Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.
Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee