- Who We Serve
- What We Do
- About Us
- Insights & Research
- Who We Serve
- What We Do
- About Us
- Insights & Research
Analysis of Fed Chair Powell’s Comments: September Cut Likely, but What After?
We analyze Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell’s comments about the potential for rate cuts in September and beyond.
- Markets & Economy
- Central Banks
- Monetary Policy
- Commentary
Key Points
What it is
We analyze Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s comments today at Jackson Hole on the potential for rate cuts in coming months.
Why it matters
Interest rates play a key role in financial market movements.
Where it's going
Our base case based on past comments has been that the Fed would make its first cut in September, but Powell was more explicit today.
We interpreted today’s (August 23) remarks at Jackson Hole by Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell as consistent with our view that, while the bar for not cutting rates in September is extremely high, much uncertainty remains about what exactly happens next. Our long-held view has been that the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will start cutting rates in September (we expect an 0.25 percentage point cut ), but that the committee will proceed carefully afterwards. Given that we don’t anticipate either a significant weakening in the labor market or an accelerated pace of disinflation, by “proceeding carefully” we meant that — contrary to market pricing — we could end up with only two rate cuts this year (September and December), with a pause in November. Based on his remarks today, Powell also seems to be leaving his options open for November. That said, we acknowledge that the risk of three cuts this year (September, November, and December) is high.
When addressing the near-term outlook for monetary policy, Powell was more explicit about a rate cut in September than he was at his July press conference. A first rate cut in September has been our base case since April, and we interpreted Powell’s comments at his July press conference to suggest that a cut in September had become the Fed’s base case too! In July, he said that “if we were to see, for example, inflation moving … more or less in line with expectations [and] growth remains … reasonably strong and the labor market remains … consistent with its current condition, then I would think that a rate cut could be on the table at the September meeting.” Today, he was more categorical than in July, saying that “the time has come for policy to adjust.”
But Powell refrained from saying much about what is likely to happen beyond September, noting only that “the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving economic outlook, and the balance of risks.” Our view has been that inflection points in the economy are typically difficult to navigate, which, from a monetary policy perspective, makes it especially tricky to provide explicit forward guidance. The labor market does seem to be at an inflection point, going from “overheated” to “normal.”
A key question for the Fed is whether labor market conditions stop at “normal,” or morph into what the most recent FOMC minutes called “a more serious deterioration.” Disinflation, too, seems to be at an inflection point, potentially transitioning from a stop-and-go pattern to showing more promising signs that a sustained downward trend to 2% is underway. But, as Powell remarked today, the Fed’s “task is not complete,” and upside risks to inflation persist. So his reluctance to provide more explicit forward guidance is understandable and, indeed, consistent with our expectations. How can you provide explicit guidance when you yourself are uncertain about the timing and pace of rate cuts?
We have long maintained that, after essentially operating as a “single-mandate central bank” in recent years, Fed behavior has been transitioning back to its normal dual-mandate mode. The single-mandate-like behavior was evidenced in the FOMC’s single-minded focus on restoring “price stability,” which is one half of its official mandate (the other half is “maximum employment”). Indeed, Powell noted today, the Fed’s “primary focus” over the past few years has been on “bringing down inflation, and appropriately so.” But today, he was more explicit than before in signaling that the times of single-mandate-like behavior are over. Echoing the most recent FOMC minutes, he noted that upside risks to inflation have diminished, and downside risks to employment have increased. And he repeated the FOMC’s latest statement that policymakers are now “attentive to the risks to both sides” of the dual mandate.
Main Point
Fed Transition
Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell was more explicit than before on the likelihood of the first rate cut in September. We expect the Fed to transition from a full focus on inflation to a dual mandate of fighting inflation and supporting maximum employment.
Antulio N. Bomfim
Head of Global Macro – Global Fixed Income
Antulio Bomfim, head of global macro for the global fixed income team, oversees interest rate strategy, systematic volatility, liquidity and monitoring of systemic risk globally. He is also responsible for the firm’s global liquidity management business.
Read BioContact Us
Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help?
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Northern Trust Asset Management (NTAM) is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.
Issued in the United Kingdom by Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, issued in the European Economic Association (“EEA”) by Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, issued in Australia by Northern Trust Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ACN 648 476 019) which holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (License Number: 529895) and is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and issued in Hong Kong by The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
For Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. This document may not be edited, altered, revised, paraphrased, or otherwise modified without the prior written permission of NTAM. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. NTAM may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.
This report is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.
All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTAM’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTAM. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For U.S. NTI prospects or clients, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative for additional information on fees.
Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTAM’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve. Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information.
Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee