- Who We Serve
- What We Do
- About Us
- Insights & Research
- Who We Serve
- What We Do
- About Us
- Insights & Research
Semi-Liquid Funds: A Practical Guide to Structure and Client Fit
How advisors can evaluate interval and tender offer funds through the lens of liquidity, client fit and implementation.
- Portfolio Construction
- Alternative Insights
Key Points
Two of the most prominent structures in the fast-maturing semi-liquid fund space are interval funds and tender offer funds.
Interval funds are generally more liquid while tender offer funds offer managers flexibility that can help protect against forced transactions.
For advisors, choosing the right vehicle comes down to selecting the one most closely aligned with a client’s needs and goals.
Shifts in the asset management landscape are pushing the semi-liquid fund market — particularly interval funds and tender offer funds within that market — to the next level of maturity. Data from XA Investments shows that the interval and tender offer fund market surpassed $300 billion in total managed assets for the first time in the first half of 2026.
What’s driving this growth? For one, traditional asset managers are facing mounting pressure in public markets — fee compression, manager competition, and performance headwinds. As a result, many are turning to for diversification, generation, and long-term growth — and the semi-liquid space is a great place for them to start that journey.
But finding success in the booming semi-liquid fund space means choosing the right vehicle. The structure through which semi-liquid private market exposure is offered determines everything: Who can invest, how often they can redeem, what operational infrastructure is required, and how the strategy is governed, particularly liquidity.
In this article, we focus specifically on two of the most prominent semi-liquid structures — interval funds and tender offer funds — to help advisors evaluate which vehicle best aligns with their clients’ goals and needs.
Start with the liquidity of the assets, not the label
A well-designed fund structure is one that appropriately matches investor liquidity expectations with the liquidity profile of the underlying investment strategy. A predictable repurchase schedule can be more suited for underlying assets that generate income or can otherwise support regular liquidity. A repurchase model that affords the manager more flexibility in timing and sizing may be a better fit when the assets have longer expected holding periods, irregular realization schedules or limited secondary-market liquidity.
Fund liquidity can come from available cash, incoming investor subscriptions, portfolio income, permitted borrowing and, when necessary, the sale of underlying assets. If the wrapper promises more access than the portfolio can comfortably support, the manager may need to hold a larger liquidity reserve, slow capital deployment or sell assets at an unfavorable time. The result can be cash drag, constrained portfolio construction or a client experience that falls short of expectations.
Interval funds: predictable liquidity offers with portfolio constraints
Interval funds are registered closed-end funds that offer to repurchase a minimum percent of shares on a predefined schedule, commonly quarterly. For advisors, that scheduled process can make the liquidity conversation more concrete. It can also support broader distribution because the structure combines private-market exposure with regular valuation, regulatory oversight and a defined repurchase framework.
The trade-off is that predictable liquidity creates a portfolio-management obligation. Strategies built around shorter-, income-producing assets, such as private credit, may be better positioned to support scheduled repurchases. Strategies dominated by assets with uncertain exit timing may face a harder choice between holding more liquid investments and accepting greater liquidity-management risk.
Importantly, a scheduled repurchase offer should not be viewed as a guarantee that an investor will be able to redeem all requested shares in any given period. If repurchase requests exceed the amount offered by the fund, shares are generally repurchased on a , and investors may need to wait for future repurchase opportunities to access additional capital. As a result, advisors should view interval funds as offering periodic opportunities for liquidity rather than assured liquidity on demand and align client expectations accordingly.
Tender offer funds: greater manager discretion, less investor certainty
Both interval funds and tender offer funds seek to balance investor access to private-market investments with the liquidity limitations inherent in the underlying assets. While both structures provide periodic opportunities for investors to access capital, neither offers daily liquidity, and neither guarantees that investors will be able to redeem all requested shares in a given period. The principal distinction is that interval funds conduct repurchase offers on a predetermined schedule with a minimum mandated repurchase amount, while tender offer funds generally provide managers with greater flexibility regarding the timing and size of repurchase offers.
Tender offer funds are also registered closed-end funds that can provide regular valuation, but liquidity is generally offered through board-approved tender offers rather than a fixed interval mechanism. Tender offer funds set out their intended repurchase schedule and amount in advance — often quarterly, at 5% or less per period — but managers have discretion in each period to repurchase fewer, or none, of the fund shares. That discretion can allow the fund’s liquidity program to reflect the assets’ realization cycle and current market conditions.
For less liquid strategies, including private equity, venture capital and real assets, this flexibility may better protect the portfolio from forced transactions. The client trade-off is less certainty about when shares can be tendered. For both interval funds and tender offer funds, advisors should frame the allocation as capital that may remain invested for an extended period, not as a substitute for daily liquidity holdings.
Fees and eligibility can change the audience
Semi-liquid funds combine complex assets with registered-fund governance, valuation, reporting and investor servicing. Those demands can result in fee structures that differ substantially from familiar mutual funds and exchange-traded funds. In some cases, performance-based fees may also affect investor eligibility and product availability. As a result, fee considerations are often best assessed alongside the broader structural and access features of the investment.
Advisors should ask who can invest, which fees apply, whether existing clients receive different economics in other vehicles, and how the structure affects the total client experience. A vehicle designed for broad distribution may require different fee choices than one intended for qualified or accredited investors.
The operating model is part of the investment proposition
A semi-liquid vehicle adds recurring demands across valuation, cash management, reporting, transfer agency, custody, compliance and fund governance. These are not merely back-office questions. Weakness in any one area can affect transaction timing, returns, communications and confidence in the vehicle.
It’s important to understand how the manager will value less liquid holdings, manage subscriptions and repurchases, oversee service providers and maintain consistency between portfolio liquidity and the fund’s investor terms.
Five questions to ask before recommending a semi-liquid fund
- What role should the allocation play in the client’s portfolio, and what capital can the client leave invested for an extended period?
- How does the liquidity of the underlying assets support the fund’s repurchase or tender-offer process?
- Is the client prepared for the possibility that full redemption may occur over time rather than in a single repurchase period?
- How do investor eligibility, fees, valuation frequency and platform requirements affect suitability and distribution?
- Does the manager’s operating model support valuation, cash management, reporting, governance and investor communication at the required scale?
The path forward
Interval and tender offer funds can both serve as bridges between daily liquidity products and fully illiquid private funds. The right choice is not the vehicle with the most liquidity or the widest access. It is the vehicle whose liquidity terms, portfolio construction and operating model fit together while meeting the investor’s risk, return and liquidity needs.
For advisors, the practical takeaway is to treat structure as part of the investment thesis. Define the portfolio role first, then test whether the underlying assets, redemption design, fees, eligibility and servicing model support that role. If those elements do not align, the wrapper can undermine the strategy it was meant to deliver.
Main Point
The right vehicle makes all the difference
Semi-liquid funds expand access to private-market strategies, but the wrapper is not a secondary detail. The wrapper determines how liquidity is delivered, which investors can participate and whether the portfolio and operating model can support the promise made to clients.
Recalibrating Rates, Not Tightening Policy
Contact Us
Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help?
Private market assets: Assets that aren’t traded on public exchanges.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
For Canada, Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. This information may not be edited, altered, revised, paraphrased, or otherwise modified without the prior written permission of NTAM. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. NTAM may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.
This information is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.
All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTAM’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTAM. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For U.S. NTI prospects or clients, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative for additional information on fees.
Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTAM’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve. Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information. Historical trends are not predictive of future results.
This information is intended for purposes of NTI and/or its affiliates marketing as providers of the products and services described herein and not to provide any fiduciary investment advice within the meaning of Section 3(21) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). NTI and/or its affiliates are not undertaking to provide a recommendation or give investment advice in a fiduciary capacity to the recipient of these materials, which are for marketing purposes and are not intended to serve as a primary basis for investment decisions. NTI and/or its affiliates may receive fees and other compensation in connection with the products and services described herein as well as for custody, fund administration, transfer agent, investment operations outsourcing, and other services rendered to various proprietary and third-party investment products and firms that may be the subject of or become associated with the services described herein.
Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company, The Northern Trust Company (Singapore Branch), and The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited.
Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee