Skip to content
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search
Investment Perspective · 08.31.26

Bond Yields: The Long and Short of It

Longer-term trends are keeping government bond yields higher – and the asset class is losing its diversification benefits in the process.

  • Volatility & Risk
Format
Change Format: Choose the format you prefer, and we'll remember your preference next time.

Key Points

Longer-term secular factors are winning out over short-term cyclical forces in shaping bond yields, sending them higher.

A growing supply of government debt, competition with the technology sector’s relentless pace of issuance and a shifting buyer base outweighs softer inflation and cooling economic activity.

Bonds are moving more closely with equities, leaving investors with an asset that is neither compellingly cheap nor as reliably protective as it once was.

Government bond yields have risen roughly 70 basis points over the past six months, and investors hoping for relief are learning an uncomfortable lesson: not all forces moving markets pull with equal strength. Tellingly, the recent decline in expected inflation brought no reprieve. Nominal yields held firm, so the entire adjustment fell on real rates, which have continued to climb.

 

Yields are shaped by two sets of hands. Longer-term secular factors – the structural supply and demand for capital – grind slowly but powerfully. Short-term cyclical forces – the ebb and flow of growth and inflation – tug in the opposite direction. Right now, the market is a tug of war, and the cyclical camp is losing.

 

On paper, the cyclical case for lower yields is respectable. Inflation prints have softened, labor markets are cooling, and the global manufacturing cycle is softening. In an earlier era, that trio would have been enough to rally bonds convincingly.

 

Yet the secular team is simply stronger. Fiscal dynamics across most major economies point to relentless issuance, with deficits structurally embedded and little political appetite to shrink them. This arrives just as the technology sector ramps up debt-funded capital expenditure, competing for the same pool of savings. The buyer base has shifted, too: the once-reliable bid from international investors is fading, replaced by domestic holders who invest at shorter horizons and are more swayed by sentiment than by yield.

 

The cyclical bulls also face a nagging doubt. Markets increasingly fear second-order inflation effects, as tighter energy markets, firmer fertilizer and oil distillate prices, and rising shipping costs feed through the system. Central banks offer reassurance by stressing vigilance on inflation risks, and several larger ones have already lifted rates, hardly the posture of an easing cycle.

 

For those tempted to buy the dip, the valuation case is only lukewarm. Term premium, compensation for the risk of holding longer-dated paper, has risen, but merely back to its historical average. Fair, not cheap.

 

The deeper worry for asset allocators is subtler. The correlation benefit of owning bonds has reversed. For most of the post global financial crisis (GFC) era, bonds rallied when equities fell, providing dependable diversification. That insurance policy has lapsed.

 

This leaves investors holding an asset that is neither compellingly cheap nor reliably protective, in a market where the strong forces push one way. For now, our team’s recommendation remains to be underweight bonds relative to stocks.

 

— Peter Wilke, CFA – Head of Tactical Asset Allocation, Global Asset Allocation

A WEAKER DIVERSIFIER – BONDS ARE MOVING MORE CLOSELY WITH EQUITIES

Interest Rates

 

Market participants entered the July Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting with unusually little conviction on the likely outcome. Chairman Warsh’s shift to brevity in his public comments and clear reluctance to offer forward guidance left investors with less policy visibility ahead of his second meeting as chair. While policy rates were held steady, three Committee members dissented in favor of a 25-basis-point hike.

 

Warsh made clear that keeping rates unchanged was the best decision, while emphasizing that future decisions will not be “inertial.” He repeatedly returned to that framing in the press conference, noting that the Committee may act if incoming inflation data is inconsistent with achieving price stability. The initial market reaction to the statement was muted, but comments on higher yields, tighter financial conditions and the potential implications of a smaller balance sheet were interpreted as reducing the likelihood of near-term hikes. The yield curve steepened as long-end yields moved higher during and after the press conference.

 

Even so, incoming inflation data still needs to justify additional tightening, and we remain neutral on duration.

 

— Dan LaRocco, Head of Liquidity, Global Fixed Income

FOMC Recap
  • The FOMC held rates steady in July, though three members dissented in favor of a hike.

  • Warsh emphasized that future decisions will not be “inertial,” keeping inflation data central to the policy path.

  • We view additional tightening as less likely than current market pricing implies and remain neutral on duration.

 

 

Credit Markets

 

High yield declined modestly in July, its first monthly loss since March, as rising Treasury yields and a 9-basis-point widening in spreads weighed on returns. The move coincided with softer equity markets, where geopolitical tensions and increased scrutiny over the cost of artificial intelligence infrastructure weighed on investor sentiment.

 

Primary activity underwhelmed, in contrast to investment grade cash markets. High yield issuance totaled $18 billion in July, broadly in line with the monthly average but well below street expectations. The slower pace reflected the delay of a large merger and acquisition (M&A) funding deal and less attractive refinancing economics for higher-quality issuers, especially 2020–2022 vintage bonds that continue to benefit from low coupon costs.

 

With current market yields are above coupons for many issuers, refinancing-related supply is less compelling despite otherwise open capital markets. We expect issuance to remain slow this month, limiting net supply and potentially providing a short-term technical tailwind for the asset class.

 

— Ben McCubbin, Co-Head of High Yield, Global Fixed Income

High Yield Refinancing Hurdle
  • July issuance was in line with monthly averages but well below street consensus estimates.

  • A delayed M&A funding deal and less attractive refinancing opportunities contributed to underwhelming primary activity.

  • We expect issuance to remain slow this month, which could be a short-term tailwind for the asset class.

 

 

Equities

 

Earnings revisions across the S&P 500 Index paint a far more differentiated picture in 2026 than a year ago. Earnings per share (EPS) revision dispersion has widened sharply, with the gap between the strongest and weakest sectors expanding from 43% to nearly 175% in 2026.

 

Cyclicals have led the upgrade cycle, with Energy and Communication Services seeing the strongest earnings revisions and reversing their 2025 trajectories. Technology and Financials have remained consistently positive, underscoring the durability of their earnings growth. In contrast, Utilities, Consumer Staples and Health Care are in negative revision territory, reflecting margin pressure and sector-specific headwinds.

 

While market leadership remains concentrated in a narrow group of stocks, stock-level movements are becoming increasingly dispersed beneath the surface. The widening gap between sector winners and losers suggests a broader opportunity set for active and systematic investors as fundamentals play a larger role in driving relative performance.

 

— Jordan Dekhayser, Senior Equity Client Portfolio Management and Daniel Kim, Associate Equity Client Portfolio Manager

Mind the Revision Gap
  • EPS revision dispersion across S&P 500 Index sectors has widened sharply in 2026 versus 2025.

  • Energy and Communication Services have led cyclical upgrades, while several defensive sectors have moved into negative revision territory..

  • Wider revision dispersion broadens the opportunity set beneath narrow index leadership.

 

 

Real Assets

 

The energy transition is best understood as a story of energy addition rather than energy replacement. Energy demand continues to rise, driven by economic growth, reindustrialization and the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure, with data centers becoming a major source of incremental power consumption.

 

While renewable sources such as solar and battery storage are expected to gain share, they are unlikely to fully displace traditional fuels. Alternative energy consumption is projected to more than double by 2040, yet traditional energy sources are still expected to account for approximately 65% of total energy use. Natural gas remains a critical transition fuel given its lower emissions profile and ability to provide reliable power.

 

Looking ahead, rising demand, energy security concerns and grid reliability requirements should drive investment across both traditional and alternative energy value chains, creating attractive opportunities across the broader energy ecosystem. We affirm a tactical overweight to global listed infrastructure on strong earnings growth and attractive valuations.

 

— Jim Hardman, Head of Real Assets, Multi-Manager

More of Everything
  • Higher energy demand forecasts support investment across the broader energy ecosystem.

  • While alternative energy should expand significantly, traditional energy sources are still projected to meet nearly two-thirds of global energy needs.

  • We affirm a tactical overweight to Global Infrastructure on strong earnings growth and attractive valuations. .

 

Unless noted otherwise, data is sourced from Bloomberg as of August 2026.

Main Point

Government bonds are neither cheap nor reliably protective

The shift is robbing investors of a key source of diversification.

The Weekender

A View From The Balcony: Escaping Bias to See Markets More Clearly

  • Read Now
overlooking theater balcony to stage

Peter Wilke

Senior Vice President – Head of Tactical Asset Allocation

As the head of tactical asset allocation (TAA) at Northern Trust Asset Management, Peter is responsible for the research and development of innovative investment strategies for the firm’s TAA initiatives. Previously, Peter worked at Wellington Management, where he was the team leader of the multi-asset income investment boutique in Boston. His group was responsible for developing and managing multi-asset portfolios.

Read Bio

Contact Us

Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help? 

{{bloomberg_1_3m_treasury_bills_index}} 

Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. The U.S. Treasury Index is a component of the U.S. Aggregate, U.S. Universal, Global Aggregate and Global Treasury Indices. The index includes securities with remaining maturity of at least one year.

Bloomberg Global Treasury Index tracks fixed-rate, local currency government debt of investment grade countries, including both developed and emerging markets. The index represents the treasury sector of the Global Aggregate Index.

Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index is a flagship measure of the U.S. municipal tax-exempt investment grade bond market. Included in the index are securities from all 50 U.S. States and four other qualifying regions (Washington DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands). The index includes state and local general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. All bonds in the Municipal Bond Index are tax exempt and hence are not eligible for other indices that include taxable bonds, such as the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate.

Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L) measures the performance of the U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) market. Federal Reserve holdings of U.S. TIPS are not index eligible and are excluded from the face amount outstanding of each bond in the index.

Bloomberg Global Inflation Linked Index (Series-L) measures the investment-grade, government inflation-linked debt from 12 different developed market countries. Investability is a key criterion for inclusion of markets in this index, and it is designed to include only those markets in which a global government linker fund is likely and able to invest.

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities (agency and non-agency). It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from twenty-seven local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers.

{{jp_morgan_embi_global_diversified}}

The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. Bonds from issuers with an emerging markets country of risk, based on the indices’ EM country definition, are excluded. The U.S. Corporate High Yield Index is a component of the U.S. Universal and Global High Yield Indices. The index was created in 1998, with history backfilled to July 1, 1983.

Bloomberg Global High Yield Index is a multi-currency flagship measure of the global high yield debt market. The index represents the union of the U.S. High Yield, the Pan-European High Yield, and Emerging Markets (EM) Hard Currency High Yield Indices. The high yield and emerging markets sub-components are mutually exclusive.

{{msci_acwi}}

MSCI USA Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the U.S. market. 

{{sp_500_index}}

{{russell_2000_index}}

R1000 Growth: The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the largecap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with relatively higher price-to-book ratios, higher I/B/E/S forecast medium term (2 year) growth and higher sales per share historical growth (5 years). The Russell 1000® Growth Index is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer for the large-cap growth segment.

{{russell_1000_value_index}}

{{msci_world_index}}

{{msci_world_ex_usa_index}} 

MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe. 

MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. 

{{msci_emerging_markets_index}}

MSCI China Index captures large and mid cap representation across China A shares, H shares, B shares, Red chips, P chips and foreign listings (e.g. ADRs). The index covers about 85% of this China equity universe. Currently, the index includes Large Cap A and Mid Cap A shares represented at 20% of their free float adjusted market capitalization. 

{{sp_global_natural_resources_index}}

{{sp_global_infrastructure_index}}

{{msci_acwi_imi_core_real_estate_index}} 

Cboe S&P 500 Dispersion Index (DSPX℠) measures the expected dispersion in the S&P 500® over the next 30 calendar days, as calculated from the prices of S&P 500 index options and the prices of single stock options of selected S&P 500 constituents, using a modified version of the VIX® methodology.

Caldara Iacoviello Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR) Uncertainty Index (GPRXGPRD) is compiled by Fed economists Dario Caldara and Matteo Iacoviello. It measures the occurrence of impactful geopolitical events/threats/conflicts since 1985 by counting the keywords used in the press. The Caldara and Iacoviello GPR index reflects automated text-search results of the electronic archives of 10 newspapers: Chicago Tribune, the Daily Telegraph, Financial Times, The Globe and Mail, The Guardian, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. Caldara and Iacoviello calculate the index by counting the number of articles related to adverse geopolitical events in each newspaper for each month (as a share of the total number of news articles).

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The information contained herein is intended for use with current or prospective clients of Northern Trust Investments, Inc (NTI) or its affiliates. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. Northern Trust Asset Management’s (NTAM)  and its affiliates may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.

This information is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.

All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTAM’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTAM. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For U.S. NTI prospects or clients, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative for additional information on fees.

Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTAM’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve.  Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information. Historical trends are not predictive of future results.

Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company, The Northern Trust Company (Singapore Branch), and The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited.

Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee