Skip to content
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search
Investment Perspective · 07.29.26

Geopolitics Is No Longer a Tail Risk

Global political tensions reshaping energy and technology have shifted from periodic sources of volatility to a defining feature of the economy.

  • Volatility & Risk
Format
Change Format: Choose the format you prefer, and we'll remember your preference next time.

Key Points

Events once thought of as geopolitical tail risks are now common occurrences embedded into the economic landscape.

The conflicts in the Middle East, Russia’s war in Ukraine and U.S.-China technology competition are examples of conflicts dominating markets.

The question is whether investors are underestimating how deeply political risks are driving markets.

Investors often ask which geopolitical tail risks keep us awake at night. Increasingly, the honest answer is: they are no longer tail risks. The conflict in the Middle East is disrupting major shipping routes and global energy markets, the war in Ukraine has rewritten Europe’s investment priorities, and the U.S.-China technology race is accelerating by the month. These are not low-probability events lurking on the horizon. They are the new baseline. The challenge for markets is not identifying the shocks. It is understanding how long they remain embedded in the economic landscape.

 

First, the Middle East. The re-escalation of the Iran-U.S. conflict is once again threatening the world's most important energy and shipping corridors. Iran continues to exert pressure over traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, while Yemen's Houthis have announced actions targeting Saudi shipping through the Bab al-Mandab Strait, the critical gateway to the Red Sea. Gulf states remain divided over how the conflict should be resolved, reducing the likelihood of a coordinated regional solution. Investors should therefore prepare for intermittent disruptions rather than a quick diplomatic breakthrough.

 

Second, Ukraine. Russia has intensified ballistic missile and drone attacks on Kyiv despite making little meaningful territorial progress in eastern Ukraine. Meanwhile, improved Ukrainian strike capabilities have increasingly targeted Russian supply lines, fuel depots, and oil infrastructure, including routes supporting Crimea. The result is a war that is shifting from territory to economic attrition. Energy markets are already feeling the effects. Diesel and refined-product markets remain unusually tight, helping keep distillate prices elevated even when crude prices appear relatively stable.

 

Third, technology. Moonshot AI's latest Kimi model is a reminder that the AI race between China and the U.S. is accelerating rather than slowing. What began as a commercial competition has evolved into a strategic contest involving intellectual property, national security, and technological leadership. Some U.S. policymakers have openly questioned whether American technological advantages are adequately protected. Investors should remember that AI is no longer merely an earnings story. It has become a geopolitical one.

 

The common thread is that the world's most important growth drivers, energy systems, and technological platforms are all becoming more politically contested. Markets continue to celebrate AI-driven productivity gains and resilient economic growth. Yet the same forces supporting growth are also intensifying geopolitical rivalry. The lesson for investors is uncomfortable but clear: geopolitics is no longer an occasional source of volatility. Increasingly, it is becoming the macroeconomic backdrop itself. The question is not whether these risks will disappear. It is whether investors have fully appreciated a world in which disrupted shipping lanes, persistent energy insecurity, and technological competition are no longer exceptions to the rule, but are priced as routinely as inflation prints or earnings season.

 

— Peter Wilke, CFA – Head of Tactical Asset Allocation, Global Asset Allocation

A MORE CONTESTED WORLD – GEOPOLITICAL UNCERTAINTY REMAINS ELEVATED

Interest Rates

 

At its June meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) held the target range unchanged as expected, but Chairman Kevin Warsh’s first meeting delivered notable developments. The Committee removed much of the statement’s boilerplate language, distilling it to just four short paragraphs. The Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) showed meaningful upward revisions to inflation and the expected rate path for the year.

 

Warsh’s press conference was also notably different. He avoided forward guidance, reaffirmed the dual mandate, and announced five task forces – covering the balance sheet, Fed communications, economic data, productivity and jobs including AI, and crucially the inflation framework, but not the 2% objective itself. His “wide lens, but narrow remit” framing underscored the emphasis on price stability.

 

The task forces may lead to more medium-term change than we initially expected, but near-term policy should remain dependent on incoming U.S. data, especially inflation. While it was not surprising to see markets price in more hikes, the data must still justify one – which we view as less likely than current pricing implies.

 

— Dan LaRocco, Head of Liquidity, Global Fixed Income

FOMC Recap
  • The first FOMC meeting under Chairman Kevin Warsh marked a notable shift in communication style.

  • Markets have priced in more hikes this year, but incoming data, especially inflation, must justify one.

  • We view a hike as less likely than current market pricing implies and remain neutral on duration.

 

 

Credit Markets

 

High yield generated modestly positive returns in June, as coupon income offset modest price declines and spread widening. The result came as the broader risk rally paused after one of the strongest two-month periods in recent history, with geopolitical volatility, concerns over artificial intelligence-related cost pressures, and sticky inflation weighing on investor sentiment.

 

Issuance remained active despite the softer market tone. High yield supply totaled $34.1 billion in June, roughly 35% above the month’s historical average of $25.3 billion and ahead of the 24-month average of $26.7 billion. Year-to-date gross issuance now stands near $186 billion. Since 2010, June has ranked as the sixth most active month for high yield issuance, sitting below the typical peaks in May and September.

 

We expect issuance conditions to remain supportive in the second half of 2026, helped by receding Middle East conflict risk, strong issuer balance sheets, and supportive regulatory policy, though activity may slow as markets enter the seasonal summer lull.

 

— Ben McCubbin, Co-Head of High Yield, Global Fixed Income

High Yield Seasonal Supply
  • High yield generated modestly positive returns in June, with coupon income offsetting modest price declines and spread widening.

  • June issuance totaled $34.1 billion, roughly 35% above its historical average since 2010.

  • Issuance conditions should remain supportive, though activity may slow during the seasonal summer lull.

 

 

Equities

 

Market returns remain increasingly concentrated in a small group of mega-cap stocks, but stock-level dispersion remains elevated relative to history. Expected dispersion has moved above its longer-term average year-to-date, signaling a wider spread between winners and losers even as index leadership remains narrow.

 

Beneath the index-level concentration, equity performance remains meaningfully differentiated across individual stocks. Technology and artificial intelligence-adjacent companies are still driving headline performance, but outcomes across sectors, styles, and companies remain uneven.

 

This creates a more constructive backdrop for systematic and active approaches that can identify relative winners and losers. Concentration remains a defining feature of the current market, but elevated cross-sectional variation suggests the opportunity set is broader than index-level leadership alone implies.

 

— Jordan Dekhayser, Senior Equity Client Portfolio Management and Daniel Kim, Associate Equity Client Portfolio Manager

Dispersion Beneath the Surface
  • Expected dispersion has trended above its longer-term average year to date.

  • The elevated spread between winners and losers signals a broad opportunity set.

  • Cross-sectional variation persists despite narrow index leadership.

 

 

Real Assets

 

Global REITs have delivered a strong start to 2026, generating a 9.4% year-to-date total return, including an 8.5% gain in the second quarter. Notably, that performance has come despite rising bond yields and shifting expectations for central bank policy, challenging the view that REITs are simply a “rates trade”. Instead, investors are increasingly rewarding companies with strong earnings growth, healthy balance sheets and resilient fundamentals.

 

Operating trends remain constructive across much of the real estate market. Demand for higher-growth sectors such as data centers and health care / senior housing continues to be supported by powerful secular tailwinds, while improving conditions in previously overlooked areas are broadening the opportunity set. Retail real estate, for example, is benefiting from lower vacancies, rising rents, and increasing foot traffic, particularly among younger consumers.

 

For investors, REITs offer a differentiated mix of income, earnings growth, inflation protection, and diversification at a time when broader equity market returns remain concentrated in a relatively small number of companies.

 

— Jim Hardman, Head of Real Assets, Multi-Manager

GREIT Halftime Report
  • Global REITs have performed well, despite shifting central bank policy expectations.

  • Investors are increasingly rewarding attractive fundamentals and earnings growth in both structural growth sectors and areas with improving conditions.

  • We affirmed a tactical overweight to real assets. Since reducing our underweight to real estate in April, the asset class has continued to show positive trends.

 

Divergent Expectations

Unless noted otherwise, data is sourced from Bloomberg as of July 2026.

Main Point

Global politics no longer an occasional source of volatility

Conflicts between nations are now too common and fundamental to be seen as tail risks.

The Weekender

Recognising Change

  • Read Now
sparklers

Peter Wilke

Senior Vice President – Head of Tactical Asset Allocation

As the head of tactical asset allocation (TAA) at Northern Trust Asset Management, Peter is responsible for the research and development of innovative investment strategies for the firm’s TAA initiatives. Previously, Peter worked at Wellington Management, where he was the team leader of the multi-asset income investment boutique in Boston. His group was responsible for developing and managing multi-asset portfolios.

Read Bio

Contact Us

Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help? 

{{bloomberg_1_3m_treasury_bills_index}} 

Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. The U.S. Treasury Index is a component of the U.S. Aggregate, U.S. Universal, Global Aggregate and Global Treasury Indices. The index includes securities with remaining maturity of at least one year.

Bloomberg Global Treasury Index tracks fixed-rate, local currency government debt of investment grade countries, including both developed and emerging markets. The index represents the treasury sector of the Global Aggregate Index.

Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index is a flagship measure of the U.S. municipal tax-exempt investment grade bond market. Included in the index are securities from all 50 U.S. States and four other qualifying regions (Washington DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands). The index includes state and local general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. All bonds in the Municipal Bond Index are tax exempt and hence are not eligible for other indices that include taxable bonds, such as the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate.

Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L) measures the performance of the U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) market. Federal Reserve holdings of U.S. TIPS are not index eligible and are excluded from the face amount outstanding of each bond in the index.

Bloomberg Global Inflation Linked Index (Series-L) measures the investment-grade, government inflation-linked debt from 12 different developed market countries. Investability is a key criterion for inclusion of markets in this index, and it is designed to include only those markets in which a global government linker fund is likely and able to invest.

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities (agency and non-agency). It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from twenty-seven local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers.

{{jp_morgan_embi_global_diversified}}

The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. Bonds from issuers with an emerging markets country of risk, based on the indices’ EM country definition, are excluded. The U.S. Corporate High Yield Index is a component of the U.S. Universal and Global High Yield Indices. The index was created in 1998, with history backfilled to July 1, 1983.

Bloomberg Global High Yield Index is a multi-currency flagship measure of the global high yield debt market. The index represents the union of the U.S. High Yield, the Pan-European High Yield, and Emerging Markets (EM) Hard Currency High Yield Indices. The high yield and emerging markets sub-components are mutually exclusive.

{{msci_acwi}}

MSCI USA Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the U.S. market. 

{{sp_500_index}}

{{russell_2000_index}}

R1000 Growth: The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the largecap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with relatively higher price-to-book ratios, higher I/B/E/S forecast medium term (2 year) growth and higher sales per share historical growth (5 years). The Russell 1000® Growth Index is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer for the large-cap growth segment.

{{russell_1000_value_index}}

{{msci_world_index}}

{{msci_world_ex_usa_index}} 

MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe. 

MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. 

{{msci_emerging_markets_index}}

MSCI China Index captures large and mid cap representation across China A shares, H shares, B shares, Red chips, P chips and foreign listings (e.g. ADRs). The index covers about 85% of this China equity universe. Currently, the index includes Large Cap A and Mid Cap A shares represented at 20% of their free float adjusted market capitalization. 

{{sp_global_natural_resources_index}}

{{sp_global_infrastructure_index}}

{{msci_acwi_imi_core_real_estate_index}} 

Cboe S&P 500 Dispersion Index (DSPX℠) measures the expected dispersion in the S&P 500® over the next 30 calendar days, as calculated from the prices of S&P 500 index options and the prices of single stock options of selected S&P 500 constituents, using a modified version of the VIX® methodology.

Caldara Iacoviello Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR) Uncertainty Index (GPRXGPRD) is compiled by Fed economists Dario Caldara and Matteo Iacoviello. It measures the occurrence of impactful geopolitical events/threats/conflicts since 1985 by counting the keywords used in the press. The Caldara and Iacoviello GPR index reflects automated text-search results of the electronic archives of 10 newspapers: Chicago Tribune, the Daily Telegraph, Financial Times, The Globe and Mail, The Guardian, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. Caldara and Iacoviello calculate the index by counting the number of articles related to adverse geopolitical events in each newspaper for each month (as a share of the total number of news articles).

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The information contained herein is intended for use with current or prospective clients of Northern Trust Investments, Inc (NTI) or its affiliates. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. Northern Trust Asset Management’s (NTAM)  and its affiliates may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.

This information is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.

All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTAM’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTAM. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For U.S. NTI prospects or clients, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative for additional information on fees.

Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTAM’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve.  Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information. Historical trends are not predictive of future results.

Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company, The Northern Trust Company (Singapore Branch), and The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited.

Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee