Skip to content
    1. Overview
    2. Alternative Managers
    3. Consultants
    4. Family Offices
    5. Financial Advisors
    6. Financial Institutions
    7. Individuals & Families
    8. Insurance Companies
    9. Investment Managers
    10. Nonprofits
    11. Pension Funds
    12. Sovereign Entities
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search
Market Insights · 10.01.25

Market Strain: What’s at Stake When the U.S. Government Shuts Down

How the shutdown may impact the Federal Reserve, the economy, stocks and bond yields.

  • Markets & Economy
  • Volatility & Risk
  • Equity Insights
  • Market Views

Key Points

What this is

The shutdown was largely priced in given entrenched partisan standoffs, but history suggests markets usually look through these episodes.

Why it matters

It coincides with Fed policy uncertainty, fragile labor dynamics and geopolitical risks, making optics and timing potentially more disruptive.

Where it's going

For long-term investors, shutdowns matter less than fundamentals. Political noise is temporary; the underlying economy remains more important.

The State of Play

 

Congress once again faces a funding standoff. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, short of the 60 needed to advance legislation. Cooperation with Democrats is required, yet Democrats have made extension of enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies their condition for supporting a funding bill. The proposal would cost an estimated $400 billion over the next decade — a significant sum in an already strained fiscal backdrop. Even a short-term extension would require financing, and with tariff revenues (underpinning the One Big Beautiful Bill Act) potentially subject to Supreme Court review, the fiscal fire only risks burning hotter. The shutdown could put upward pressure on long-term yields.

 

This stalemate has less to do with budget mechanics and more with political messaging. Democrats believe they can cast Republicans as responsible if the government shuts down. Republicans counter that Democrats’ demands will be viewed as the trigger. History, however, offers guidance: the party most closely associated with “forcing” a shutdown tends to be blamed. In 2013, Republicans were cast as the culprits when they sought to weaken the ACA and paid the political price. 

 

 

Why This Shutdown Feels Different

 

On the surface, shutdowns are a recurring event — 20 of them in the past five decades, with most resolved relatively quickly. But the context surrounding this one makes it more complex: 

 

  • Fed dependency on data: The Fed is at a policy crossroads, stressing its data dependence. A shutdown would delay critical reports like nonfarm payrolls, inflation measures, and spending data. Too many blind spots could force the Fed to operate more cautiously — or overreact. Markets may struggle to interpret policy signals absent fresh data.

  • Compounding external shocks: A hurricane threatening the East Coast underscores how poorly timed this could be. Simultaneously, elevated geopolitical tensions add another layer of uncertainty. Shutdowns are never convenient, but this collision of political dysfunction with real-world shocks heightens the risks around public perception and market sentiment.

  • Optics and labor market fragility: The Office of Budget and Management has hinted agencies should consider layoffs (reductions in force) rather than furloughs once funding lapses. While likely a negotiating tactic rather than a serious plan, the suggestion is notable. Federal jobs make up less than 2% of the labor market, but forced layoffs would worsen an already-softening jobs picture and potentially dent consumer sentiment.

 

 

Market Implications: Noise vs. Signal

 

In practice, the economic impact of government shutdowns has generally been modest. Furloughed employees tend to be repaid, creating temporary distortions in reported data but little in terms of lasting growth impact. Markets have often looked past the noise. Historically, equities have tended to move higher in the month following shutdowns, as investors refocus on fundamentals once political theater subsides.

 

The larger risk lies not in the shutdown itself, but in the secondary consequences: delayed data, fraying investor confidence and headline volatility. Consensus suggests markets can “tolerate” about two weeks of missing data before unease builds. Beyond that, the Fed itself could be constrained, flying increasingly blind. These dynamics are sharper now given how dependent current policy debates are on hard data about jobs, growth, and inflation.

 

 

Long-Term Perspective

 

Policymakers may posture and markets may whipsaw as headlines evolve, but shutdowns fit squarely in the category of political noise. Fundamentals — earnings, credit conditions, consumer health — ultimately do the heavy lifting in determining market direction. The short-term spectacle of Washington brinkmanship shouldn’t cloud the longer-term opportunity set.

 

Investors should prepare for a noisy, potentially drawn-out standoff. Both parties are dug in, the risks are non-trivial, and the timing exacerbates challenges for policymakers and markets. But history offers perspective: shutdowns come and go. The lasting impact on markets and the economy has historically been minimal or neutral. In the end, we encourage investors to keep focused on what matters most — long-term fundamentals. Short-term turbulence aside, conviction in a long-term discipline remains the best strategy through political storms.

Main Point

Filtering through the noise

Both parties are dug in, the risks are non-trivial, and the timing exacerbates challenges for policymakers and markets. We encourage investors to keep focused on what matters most — long-term fundamentals.

Investment Perspective

Markets on the Front Foot: Are Expectations Outpacing Reality?

  • Read Now
runners compete on race track

Joseph Tanious

Chief Investment Strategist, North America

Joseph Tanious is chief investment strategist, North America for Northern Trust Asset Management. He is responsible for developing and communicating the firm’s investment outlook across asset classes as well as producing investment analysis and thought leadership for the broader marketplace globally. To build out economic and market views, Joe regularly collaborates with the firm’s investment teams in equities, fixed income, multi-asset and alternatives.

Read Bio

Contact Us

Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help? 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

For Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. This information may not be edited, altered, revised, paraphrased, or otherwise modified without the prior written permission of NTAM. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. NTAM may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.

This information is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.

All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTAM’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTAM. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For U.S. NTI prospects or clients, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative for additional information on fees.

Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTAM’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve.  Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information.

This information is intended for purposes of NTI and/or its affiliates marketing as providers of the products and services described herein and not to provide any fiduciary investment advice within the meaning of Section 3(21) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). NTI and/or its affiliates are not undertaking to provide a recommendation or give investment advice in a fiduciary capacity to the recipient of these materials, which are for marketing purposes and are not intended to serve as a primary basis for investment decisions. NTI and/or its affiliates may receive fees and other compensation in connection with the products and services described herein as well as for custody, fund administration, transfer agent, investment operations outsourcing, and other services rendered to various proprietary and third-party investment products and firms that may be the subject of or become associated with the services described herein.

Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.

Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee