Skip to content
    1. Overview
    2. Alternative Managers
    3. Consultants
    4. Corporations
    5. Family Offices
    6. Financial Advisors
    7. Financial Institutions
    8. Individuals & Families
    9. Insurance Companies
    10. Investment Managers
    11. Nonprofits
    12. Pension Funds
    13. Sovereign Entities
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search
Save to bookmarks
Point of View · 10.02.24

U.S. Election 2024: What Can Investors Expect with So Much at Stake?

We analyze how policy positions by presidential candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could create industry specific risks.

  • Markets & Economy
  • Politics
  • Elections
  • Equity Insights
Format
Article
Executive Summary

Key Points

What this is

We analyze the policy stances of the presidential candidates and how past election results have impacted market returns.

Why it matters

While other factors usually hold more sway over returns, election outcomes may create nuanced risks and opportunities for investors.

Where it's going

Election results historically haven’t had a clear impact on market returns, but investors may seek to understand industry-specific regulatory risks based on outcome.

As the U.S. election closes in on November 5, investors continue to weigh the potential impact of various voting outcomes. While all eyes are on the tight race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, voters will also decide on Congress, which is divided with the Democrats maintaining a small advantage in the Senate and Republicans doing likewise in the House. Ultimately, the combination of executive and legislative control will determine the scope of what the president will be able to accomplish.

 

We will leave the election forecasting to the political experts and instead look to provide readers with some insights on the candidates’ stance on economically important issues, and how that may impact certain sectors. We then take a historical, data driven perspective to look at how sectors and markets have performed during previous administrations. We believe this historical perspective is important and highlights that election outcomes are but one part of a complex network of variables that ultimately drive investment returns.

 

As we head into the fall, investors will have their eyes on a number of items in addition to the , including the start of a Federal Reserve rate-cutting cycle, the balance of inflation and unemployment, and whether the economy executes a soft-landing. Our base case remains for a soft landing based on a resilient U.S. economy and a constructive outlook for macroeconomic and corporate fundamentals. However, one of our risk cases is that inflation remains stubborn, with the election outcome as one of the culprits.

 

 

Election Impact?

 

Key issues for candidates Trump and Harris include taxes, tariffs, regulation, climate change and immigration. On taxes, most provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 expire at the end of 2025, including the current reduction in the top marginal tax rate from 39.6% to 37%. The cost to extend this and other provisions of the TCJA is estimated at $3.3 trillion over the next 10 years. This staggering cost comes as the nation’s annual budget deficit reached $1.7 trillion in 2023. Each candidate has laid out their stance on taxes, but how this ultimately gets resolved depends on a number of variables including the combination of executive and legislative branch control. Creditors will be keeping a close eye on how this plays out, and how the outcome will impact yields and influence bond market volatility.

 

Regarding tariffs and trade restrictions, notably with China, we expect both candidates to continue longer run de-globalization trends, albeit with differences in their approach. On other issues, Trump’s stance on immigration can be expected to limit labor supply, potentially increasing the cost of labor, while Harris’s focus on climate change could see an increase in spending that impacts the cost of raw materials needed to facilitate a low carbon transition. Taken together, we can see the transmission mechanisms that may have an incrementally inflationary effect. In Exhibit 1, we provide more specifics on these areas as well as potential sector impacts. These represent the candidates’ stated views, but again we expect that many of these areas will be heavily negotiated in 2025 and beyond.

EXHIBIT 1: Where candidates stand

where candidates stand

Source: Northern Trust Asset Management. Stances derived from multiple third party sources including statements made by the candidates or their staff, or articles from sources citing those statements. Sector views reflect the informed views of the Capital Structure Research Team which comprises sector-focused analysts.

As discussed in Exhibit 1, each candidate’s stance on the issues highlighted will have an impact on certain sectors. In Exhibit 2, our capital structure team explores this in more detail.

EXHIBIT 2: CandidAte policy impact on sectors

candidate policy impact on sectors

Source: Northern Trust Asset Management. Comments reflect the informed views of the Capital Structure Team which comprises sector-focused analysts.

Sector Impacts: Much Ado about Nothing?

 

While rules and regulations impact the economy and individual sectors as highlighted above, history has shown that political control is not a robust indicator for sector returns. There are three main reasons this is the case. First, returns are ultimately driven by fundamentals — revenues, profit margins, capital decisions, changes in valuation, and the broader business cycle — along with market sentiment. Policy can have an impact on these variables, but is not at the top of the list of return drivers, and can operate at a significant lag. Second, there is a lack of clarity about certain policy details and what ultimately gets enacted, making it difficult to determine how policy may effect each of the return drivers even with the election results in hand. Third, unforeseen exogenous shocks such as the pandemic and ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East continue to roil markets. Therefore, unforeseen events may influence sector returns contrary to what presidential policy may suggest.

 

To make this point clear, we evaluated the relationship between Democratic or Republican presidents and the relative sector performance six months post- election. Exhibit 3 indicates that, on average, the financials and communication services sectors performed better during Democratic presidencies. The materials and utilities sectors did likewise during Republican presidencies. While energy was strong under both parties, economic influences, like the pandemic, impacted results. These outcomes remained relatively consistent even a year after the election, indicating some post-election sector momentum.

EXHIBIT 3: HISTORICAL STOCK PERFORMANCE BY PRESIDENTIAL PARTY, PART ONE

 

Sectors are impacted by a lot more than who occupies the White House.

historical stock performance by presidential party

Source: Northern Trust Asset Management, S&P, Bloomberg. Total returns are based on election dates. Republicans are colored red; Democrats are colored blue. Covers election years from 1992 through 2020. Data as of 12-31-2023. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The sample size is small — three Republicans and Democratic presidents — and the averages conceal a wide variation in results. In fact, only the industrials and materials sectors showed consistent (either all positive or all negative) returns for a given political party’s election years. In some regards, these results seem counterintuitive, but once again highlights the challenges of investing tactically because the expected impact from policy initiatives does not necessarily translate into returns.

 

 

Market Reactions: A Historical Perspective

 

This decoupling of political control and returns goes beyond sectors, and expands to include the stock market as a whole. As shown in Exhibit 4, there is no clear relationship between a president’s political party and stock market results. Rather, market movement is determined by a complex interplay of the economy, corporate fundamentals (revenues, profit margins, innovation), valuation and sentiment. Certainly, there is a relationship between policy and these variables, but it can be difficult to attribute the impact when looking at market performance.

EXHIBIT 4: HISTORICAL STOCK PERFORMANCE BY PRESIDENTIAL PARTY, PART TWO

 

Stock markets are impacted by a lot more than who occupies the White House.

s&p 500 returns by administration

Source: Northern Trust Asset Management, S&P, Bloomberg. Returns are based on inauguration dates. Republicans are colored red; Democrats are colored blue. Biden’s return is calculated through 7-31-2024. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

For example, President George W. Bush presided over most of the lost decade of stock market returns, as his time in office was book-ended by a bursting of the dot-com bubble and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. While those in charge hold some degree of responsibility for these events, there were plenty of outside forces at play that were contributing factors. The good news for investors is that market returns have been robust across presidential leadership, with the S&P 500 posting double digit returns in all but three administrations since 1945 (and returns during President John F. Kennedy’s term just missing double digits).

 

Nor does a presidency operate in isolation. A president’s ability to enact legislation that may influence market events is dependent on the makeup of Congress. Exhibit 5 shows the relationship between stock market returns and the executive and legislative branches since World War II. First, we show S&P 500 Index returns based on executive leadership (regardless of Congress) — effectively the political party averages of Exhibit 4. Those averages are then divided into whether the president had full congressional support or a split government, with the acknowledgment that the small sample size of the data prevents us from drawing conclusions between them. Regardless, as with the presidential analysis above, investors should take comfort in these results that, historically, the market’s returns have been robust regardless of the political permutations shown.

EXHIBIT 5: POLITICAL PERMUTATIONS

 

The balance of power in Washington can be felt on Wall Street.

average annual total returns sorted by political party in control (%)

Source: Northern Trust Asset Management, Bloomberg. Historical data shows calendar year S&P 500 total returns for presidential election years 1945 through 7-31-2024. Data through 7-31-2024. Number of instances: Republican president regardless of Congress 40, Democrat 39, Republican with full congressional support 7, Democrat 24, Republican president with split government 33, Democrat 15. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Conclusions: Preparation not Prediction

 

When facing significant uncertainty, as with the upcoming U.S. election, it is natural to think of the potential outcomes as binary — either good or bad. Frequently, however, the result is much more nuanced. Each candidate has laid out their stance on key policy areas, and while we hypothesized the incremental impact to certain sectors, mapping that to sector returns is fraught with challenges. We showed how sectors and markets in the U.S. performed across administrations and permutations of Congress. If anything, we hope these results comfort investors and highlight that strong stock market outcomes transcend who is in office. That said, investors can still prepare for risk cases based on the expected impact of policy. We maintain our base case of a soft landing supported by constructive fundamentals and easing inflation providing room for central banks around the globe to lower interest rates. However, one of our risk cases is that inflation remains stubborn, with election outcomes as a potential contributor.

 

As investors think through portfolio implications of the election, staying focused on strategic long-term goals is as important as ever. November’s results will certainly influence how the issues highlighted in Exhibit 1 ultimately get resolved, but investors should not lose sight of the fundamental drivers of market returns. Rather than trying to predict election outcomes and their impact on markets, we believe in preparing for different economic scenarios, remaining historically aware, and avoiding the urge to be overly reactive to changes in political leadership.

Main Point

Stock returns historically have typically transcended the party in power

Our analysis shows Harris’s and Trump’s stances on economic issues may impact sectors, but the economy and corporate fundamentals will likely have the biggest impact on markets.

Related Content

Municipal Bonds: Fiscal 2025 State Outlook

  • View Now
mountain horizon

Contact Us

Interested in learning more about our expertise and how we can help? 

Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.

NTAM products and services are issued in the United Kingdom by Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, issued in the European Economic Association (“EEA”) by Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, issued in Australia by Northern Trust Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ACN 648 476 019) which holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (License Number: 529895) and is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and issued in Hong Kong by The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

For Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. The information contained herein is intended for use with current or prospective clients of Northern Trust Investments, Inc (NTI) or its affiliates. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. NTI or its affiliates may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.

 

This report is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.

 

All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTI or its affiliates’ efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

 

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTI or its affiliates. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For additional information on fees, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative.

 

Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTI or its affiliates’ current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve.  Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information.

 

This information is intended for purposes of NTI and/or its affiliates marketing as providers of the products and services described herein and not to provide any fiduciary investment advice within the meaning of Section 3(21) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). NTI and/or its affiliates are not undertaking to provide impartial investment advice or give advice in a fiduciary capacity to the recipient of these materials, which are for marketing purposes and are not intended to serve as a primary basis for investment decisions. NTI and its affiliates receive fees and other compensation in connection with the products and services described herein as well as for custody, fund administration, transfer agent, investment operations outsourcing, and other services rendered to various proprietary and third-party investment products and firms that may be the subject of or become associated with the services described herein.